![]() |
|
An Ugly Mood In Red Sox Nation
"I hate Josh Beckett." That's about the only non-profane comment you can read today at JoyOfSox, the Red Sox blog.
Red at Surviving Grady writes:
They're both talking, of course, of this weekend's five-game series between the Yankees and Red Sox. The Yankees got to Boston a game and a half in first place, and the Red Sox play tougher than any other team in the majors in their home ballpark. There was, in Boston, so much hope. So far, the Yankees have taken the first three games by a combined score of 734 to 7. (Actually, the collective score of the three games is only 39 to 20, but it sure has seemed a lot more brutal than that.) Both teams have been in transition since the pivotal 2003-2004 seasons, when the Yankees won the pennant one year, and the Red Sox the next. The Yankees have brought up new players like Robinson Cano (who was elected as an All Star this year), Melky Cabrera, who is hitting nearly .300, Chien Ming Wang (a 14-game winner so far this year who is now one of the most efficent pitchers in Major League Baseball.) The Red Sox have brought up players like Somebody Delcarmen, a New York native named Craig Hansen and a stream of other relief pitchers whose Earned Run Average is north of 8.00. Boston management and players have, until this weekend, been approaching the game like every mistake can be absolved by a walk-off, five-run home run by David Ortiz. It's worked for a while. But even Ortiz looks tired this weekend, especially odd since he only has to play half a game every day as the team's designated hitter. There are two games left in this series, including tonight's expected pitcher's duel between Mike Mussina and Curt Schilling. But right now the Yankees are sitting in first place have a 4-and-a-half game lead over the Red Sox. As Yogi used to say, it's getting late early out there. By Ed Moltzen · 20 August 2006
Live writer
This is being written on Microsoft's Live Writer. It's just a test. By Ed Moltzen · 17 August 2006
Smearing Rudy
The bad news for Rudy Giuliani is that he's under attack from both the left and the right of the political spectrum. The good news: So far, the criticism has been surprisingly weak. Let's start with Kate O'Beirne, who has provided a conservative hit piece on the former New York City mayor in National Review. Not only is the piece light on perspective, it's patently unfair. Here's why it's unfair: The magazine touted its cover picture of Rudy Giuliani in drag (from a comic sketch he did a few years ago in connection with a charity benefit with the New York City press core.) Online, it also provides the first few paragraphs of O'Beirne's piece, which seem like the piece could be reasonable; it points out that despite his demonstration of calm, resolution and courage during the 9/11 attacks, Giuliani is so left-wing that Republican support for president in 2008 is a ludicrous idea. That's all most people will see: the outrageous photo and seemingly even-tempered prose. But once you plunk down the $3.95 for the print issue, to read O'Beirne's piece in its entirety, you see why NR editors may not have wanted a broader audience to take a look at her arguments. Among them: One conservative strategist predicts that when Giuliani's positions and record are better known, conservative primary voters will not only back other candidates but mobilize against him. Republican voters who currently prefer Rudy Giuliani to John McCain because of the latter's well-known maverick streak may not know that Mayor Giuliani endorsed Mario Cuomo for governor in 1994. They may also have been unaware that Ronald Reagan supported FDR and The New Deal, and that Reagan was a one-time high-ranking member of an organized labor union. Or they may have been aware of it. When Reagan ran for president in 1980, it didn't matter. O'Beirne also writes about Giuliani's two divorces. But she doesn't note that John McCain has also gone through a divorce, as did Reagan. She makes note that Giuliani has favored "gay rights" (during an era when same-sex marriage wasn't part of the discussion.) But she fails to note that McCain this year voted against against a constitutional amendment to define marriage as being between a man and a woman. (McCain even called a gay-marriage ban "un-Republican.") And she also fails to note that America's most powerful gay-rights supporter, Vice President Dick Cheney, not only won the GOP nomination in 2000 and 2004, but won 60 million votes two years ago. In fact, to compare the two apparent frontrunners for the GOP presidential nod in 2008, Giuliani and McCain: Both have opposed restrictions on gays, both have been divorced. McCain has voted for federal funding of stem-cell research. Both have compelling resumes. But, she writes, there are "widespread Republican reservations about Giuliani." (Emphasis added.) Evidently, not so widespread to stop Giuliani from becoming the hottest name on the campaign fundraising circuit for Republicans across the country, including Rick Santorum and Ralph Reed. (Feel free to post below the national Republican fundraising schedules of Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney or Sen. George Allen.) So the issue, it seems, comes down to the fact that Giuliani supports abortion rights, while McCain and others - including Romney and Allen - do not. So does this disqualify Giuliani from the nomination? Here's what Bob Dole said, when he ran successfully for the Republican nomination for president in 1996: My view is that I want to bring people into the party, not keep people out of the party. I don't want to build a fence around our party and say everybody has to agree with me on this issue. I happen to be pro-life. And I've tried to explain to some of the pro-life people if we're going to win elections and build our party, we can have different views on this issue. And that'll be my hope when I determine precisely what that plank should be. But a story on whether the abortion issue would prevent Giuliani from becoming president would put a great cover photo - and some potentially useful innuendo - to waste. On the other side of the political spectrum, liberal muckraker Wayne Barrett has co-authored a book with Dan Collins, Grand Illusion: The Untold Story of Rudy Giuliani and 9/11 , which attempts to debunk Giulani's reputation from 9/11. In the book, which is due out later this month, one of the biggest critics of Giuliani's pre-9/11, emergency-preparedness record is New York Police Commission Ray Kelly. (Who is now backtracking.) More on that, and Kelly's own record in New York and in the Clinton Administration, when the book is out. For now, war hawk/social liberal Roger Simon is taking on some of the anti-Giuliani crowd, and a poll by war hawk/social liberal Glenn Reynolds shows a favorable trend for a Giuliani-Romney ticket against a McCain-Lieberman ticket. While support in those venues for war hawk/social liberal Giuliani might not be so surprising, O'Beirne may want to look over some photos from the 2006 campaign. There may be some photos of Giuliani with Rick Santorum or Ralph Reed National Review might want for its next cover. By Ed Moltzen · 12 August 2006
The Al Qaeda JV?
Did the al Qaeda-linked plot to blow up planes between England and the U.S. fail because it was being handled by the junior varsity, while the varsity remains pinned down in Iraq? Coalition troops are killing and capturing an awful lot of terrorists in Iraq: COALITION FORCES CAPTURE WANTED TERRORIST IN BAYJI IRAQI NATIONAL POLICE, MND-B SOLDIERS RAID DOURA MARKET, SEIZE WEAPONS, DETAIN 3 TERRORISTS COALITION FORCES DETAIN WANTED TERRORIST IA SOLDIERS DETAIN 6 SUSPECTED TERRORISTS, SEIZE LARGE WEAPONS CACHE COMBINED MISSION NETS 13 SUSPECTED TERRORISTS FOUR TERRORISTS KILLED WHILE PLANTING ROADSIDE BOMBS IA SOLDIERS FOIL KIDNAPPING, DETAIN TERRORISTS And that's just the last few days in Iraq... By Ed Moltzen · 12 August 2006
Mike Douglas
Before Merv, before Oprah, before Phil Donahue, before Letterman, before Springer and before Howard Stern, there was Mike Douglas.
Mike Douglas was the man who brought cutting-edge standup comedy - from the likes of Richard Pryor, George Carlin, Jay Leno and others - to everybody who fell alseep before Johnny Carson came on. Mike Douglas died today, the day he turned 81. One of the strongest memories of the man and his program was the week that he brought John Lennon and Yoko Ono to his show in Philadelphia, where they co-hosted the program with him for five straight days. It was as riveting as anything you could watch on TV during the '70s. Here's a clip of Lennon performing on The Mike Douglas Show: Was Mike Douglas cool? Felix Bunay: "While other kids were playing stickball or 'war' or 'cowboys and indians,' we would go out in the back yard and pretend to be on The Mike Douglas Show." By Ed Moltzen · 11 August 2006
Giuliani on the Global War on Terror
Rudy Giuliani was on Hannity & Colmes last night on Fox News, and got behind President Bush's defense strategy against al Qaeda and in Iraq, and strongly behind Israel's campaign against the Hezbollah terrorist network. Here is some of what he said: GIULIANI: Engaging the terrorists by being on offense against them has kept us safe. And - we're not going to be safe forever. And we are going to be attacked again. But I am convinced that the actions that George Bush took, by going on the offense against terrorism starting on Sept. 20, 2001 has given us a degree of safety... Regarding Israel's actions, Giuliani said he thought it was good news that Hezbollah was being decimated now, rather than in four or five years when it could have even stronger weaponry than it now has. By Ed Moltzen · 11 August 2006
Terror Plot Disruption
"60 Minutes" collaborator Josh Marshall questions the timing (sort of): Rove and his crew of course will stop at no end of bamboozlement and terror manipulation for political ends though. And the timing, well ... Last night, Dick Morris said on Bill O'Reilly's program that had the terror plot been broken on Monday instead of Thursday, Iraq-war supporter Sen. Joe Lieberman would have handily defeated Ned Lamont in Connecticut's Democratic Senate primary. (Rudy Giuliani, in a later appearance on Fox, agreed that a Monday disruption would have ended Lamont's peace march to the Senate.) Which is all counterintuitive for a Rovian plot (i.e., the "Albright Theory" of locking Osama bin Laden in a basement and bringing him out days before an election.) But, as Marshall explains, presidential advisor Karl Rove and others in government would stop at no end of "bamboozlement and terror manipulation." By Ed Moltzen · 11 August 2006
Beverages, Airport Security, Etc.
The question now is, will Sierra Mist continue to run this commercial? (It would be almost a shame if they pulled it.) By Ed Moltzen · 10 August 2006
Extra Innings
Those who would consign (Sen. Joe) Lieberman to the dustbin of history need to realize that the Democratic primary in Connecticut is an affair that could be conducted in a good sized phone booth. About 140,000 people voted for Lamont. But the state saw 1,575,000 votes cast in the general election of 2004. Assume a lower turnout in 2006 (an off year), say 1 million votes, that still leaves 860,000 that can vote for Lieberman. Morris used to work for Ned Lamont, and he sees Sen. Joe Lieberman having no problem putting Lamont away in November. He said Lieberman, in a general election campaign, can easily paint Lamont as an out-of-his-league "dilettante." By Ed Moltzen · 9 August 2006
WikiMapia
Use WikiMapia to cut and paste areas from Google Maps to your web site. Areas, like Yankee Stadium. By Ed Moltzen · 7 August 2006
David Ortiz, Team Player
American League MVP contender David Ortiz, a regular designated hitter, is being asked to play first base for his team, the Boston Red Sox, while it maneuvers through a series of injuries. His enthusiastic comments make it easy to see him for the team player he truly is: "I'm an employee here, I do what they tell me, you know what I'm saying," Ortiz said. Yes, David. We know what you're saying. By Ed Moltzen · 6 August 2006
Lamont Lament
"I don't know anything about the blogs. I'm not responsible for those. I have no comment on them." - Ned Lamont, as quoted in the Washington Post.
By Ed Moltzen · 3 August 2006
MTV 25
Tonight is the 25th anniversary of the launch of MTV. Allan Sniffen sounds bitter: MTV was the absolute worst thing that happened to music and radio. It killed hits becoming hits because they were good music. Instead, hits became hits because of their videos and popular culture hooks that were exploited by MTV. Well, it certainly killed the music radio template for presenting music. Did Comedy Central kill standup comedy? It certainly provided a lower-cost alternative to comedy clubs for seeing standup comedy. But there's been an awful lot of brilliant standup comedy in the past 20 years. Did HBO kill the movies? Did CNN kill the 6 p.m. local newscast? You could ask these questions all day long. Did MTV prevent good music from getting airplay on the radio, if it wasn't accompanied by a great video? Probably no more than payola has prevented good music from getting airplay on the radio if a recording artist didn't have the "right" label with radio station connections. Besides, MTV hasn't been about primarily about music video for at least the last decade of its 25 years. By Ed Moltzen · 1 August 2006
Lame Blog Promotion
U.S. Rep. Steve Israel of Long Island just sent out an email to constituents on his opt-in list. The subject line, "Check Out My Blog!" While that's certainly a lame way to promote a blog, even for a professional politician, Israel's blog itself isn't bad whether you agree with his politics or not. It includes a blow-by-blow account of how Republicans killed the minimum wage increase proposal: It was Washington politics as usual. Republicans could take credit for passing a minimum wage bill in the House even though they knew it would fail in the Republican Senate. Politics trumped policy. Now, all he needs to do is link to the web sites or blogs of those congressmen he's accusing and he would take his blog to the next level. And if he drops the lame blog promotion, people might actually read it and engage him in debate. By Ed Moltzen · 1 August 2006
|
  |