Late Final
Late Final
Search for    
Houston, We Have A Problem

Apologies for the headline, but you know everybody else will be doing it...

Below is a photo (from here) as of about ten minutes ago showing the exodus from Houston. Shouldn't someone give the order to turn the southbound lanes into additional northbound (i.e. evacuation) lanes?

Wasn't this an issue during the New Orleans evacuation?

houston.jpg


MORE: Reportedly, Gov. Perry did make an order but, according to the traffic cams, not every southbound road has been converted to northbound traffic as of this point.

By Ed Moltzen  ·  22 September 2005
LINK  ·   Comments (1)
0

Slouching Toward Armageddon

N. Korea agrees to give up nuclear program

BEIJING, China (CNN) -- Nearly three years after ordering U.N. nuclear inspectors out of the country, North Korea Monday agreed to give up its entire nuclear program, including weapons, a joint statement from six-party nuclear arms talks in Beijing said.

"We should long ago have been negotiating bilaterally with North Korea...George Bush has run the most arrogant, inept, reckless, and ideological foreign policy in the modern history of our country." - Sen. John Kerry.

"...(T)he President must explain why war with Iraq won't distract us from the more immediate and graver danger posed by North Korea." U.S. Sen. Ted Kennedy.

" I don't know whether it's inevitable, no matter what is done from this point on, that North Korea is bound and determined to not only increase their nuclear arsenal but to have a throw weight capacity to be able to put it on top of a missile and send it hurtling across the ocean with a third stage of a Nodong missile. I don't know. I suspect that is it. I don't know that in fact it can be stopped." - U.S. Sen. Joe Biden.

"Our current path leads to one of two bad outcomes: either the United States essentially will acquiesce to the North's serial production of nuclear weapons, or we will find ourselves in a military confrontation with a desperate, nuclear-armed, regime." U.S. Sens Harry Reid, Joe Biden, Carl Levin, John D. Rockefeller IV, in letter to President Bush.

"Here is my biggest concern: North Korea is about to go nuclear on this president's watch, because he refuses to discuss the matter with them." - Howard Dean.

"In this case, however, we demonstrably don't have a plan. Because of that lack of a plan, the fact that the North Koreans are now months away from cranking out nuclear weapons really is a big national security set-back for the United States and its allies in the region. How and why exactly did the US let that happen? Now we're reduced to saying we're willing to accept what we were previously never willing to accept: a nuclear North Korea." - Josh Marshall.

"But the American military may already be in real danger: What threats, exactly, can the United States make against the North Koreans? That John Bolton will yell at them?" - Paul Krugman.

Feel free to add any additional prescient quotes in the comments below.

By Ed Moltzen  ·  19 September 2005
LINK  ·   Comments (0)   ·  TrackBack (0)
0

The Other Air America Scandal

A poster on the New York Radio Message Board points to the other scandal involving Air America Radio - namely, the liberal radio network's flimsy claim that it broadcasts quality radio:

Last night, I heard a "Best of Majority Report" discussing a special election about to take place in Ohio where a marine who served in Iraq was running for Congress as a Democrat. But we already know he narrowly lost... and the rest of us are talking about Hurricane Katrina and the political fall-out from it... not a month-old election.

Geez, how can this network still be re-running shows from months previous? The Majority Report (stupid name) is hosted by Janeine Garofalo and Sam Sedar. How can BOTH of them be off weeks after Labor Day?

Granted, Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh, among other conservative radio hosts, take ample amounts of vacation and off-time. But A) when they do, they often have guest hosts and B) they've already developed loyal listener bases. Air America Radio is still struggling for listeners in most markets. Is it wise to air re-runs from just a couple of months ago?

The poster also points to a little-discussed financial scandal at Air America Radio: namely, the fact that it pays Jerry Springer money - any money at all:

Gerry (sic) Springer (9am-noon) is only so-so but at least he brings a big name to the table. He's only been doing this a few months but he's got to inject a bit more levity into his show (Rush has proven that humor is a must, even on political talk radio). And sometimes he relies too much on his callers.

And, after more than a year on the air, does anyone else get the impression that Al Franken simply makes a better radio guest than a radio host? Politics aside, the times when Franken was a guest on Howard Stern's show, it was fun radio. Franken's own program on Air America sounds as if he's taken more than a few doses of haughty pills from John Kerry.

By Ed Moltzen  ·  18 September 2005
LINK  ·   Comments (1)
0

Is There A Doctor In The Cave?

Bin Laden is sick, and looking for medical help, according to this report.

By Ed Moltzen  ·  14 September 2005
LINK  ·   Comments (0)   ·  TrackBack (0)
0

NY Times Correction du Jour

The Times shows us its web savvy:

An article in Science Times yesterday about a dispute between astronomers over credit for the discovery of 2003 EL61, a large icy object in the outer solar system, misstated the term for the identification number assigned by the Internet to every computer. The number, by which American astronomers were able to trace a Spanish group's visits to their Web site before the discovery was announced, is called an IP address (for "Internet protocol"), not IPP numbers.
By Ed Moltzen  ·  14 September 2005
LINK  ·   Comments (0)   ·  TrackBack (0)
0

Mission Critical

Emergencies, first responders and high tech: some thoughts.

By Ed Moltzen  ·  12 September 2005
LINK  ·   Comments (0)
0

Bouncing Polls

Newsweek says President Bush's approval rating is way down.
Rasmussen Reports, which usually acts as a leading indicator (by two or three days) of other polls, says it's already started to bounce up again.

By Ed Moltzen  ·  10 September 2005
LINK  ·   Comments (0)
0

Oh...*That* Flood Prevention Funding

Rich Lowry notes that the Bush Administration raised some questions, and obtained three indictments, last year stemming from how federal flood prevention funds were spent by some Louisiana state officials.

This won't be the last look at the functioning of the Louisiana and New Orleans governments, nor the last look at the functioning of the federal government.

By Ed Moltzen  ·   8 September 2005
LINK  ·   Comments (0)
0

Fingers Every Which Way

Gallup's poll on the Katrina/New Orleans catastrophe finds this statistic:

When asked to identify who was most responsible for the problems in New Orleans after the hurricane, 38% of Americans said no one was really to blame, while 13% cited Bush, 18% the federal agencies, and 25% state and local officials.

So while certain, media hotheads, and others, may be focusing on the finger of blame, a plurality of Americans simply aren't. They're springing into action, collecting donations, giving money or saying prayers. Because that's what Americans do.

Michele Catalano sums what Gallup seems to put into numbers:

I'm not saying blame shouldn't be placed and people should not be held accountable for what went wrong. But to use this whole tragedy for political gain, to take up the mantle as cheerleader for your party in the wake of thousands of deaths, to have this attitude that this must be drawn along party lines, this must be an us v. them issue, that this is a call to arms, to gather your weapon of words and stand blindly and loyally behind your R or D and get ready to sling the bows and arrows until one of you is declared the winner by virtue of being blamed the least - that's just reprehensible.

Expect the finger-pointers to have some fingers pointed at them for their behavior as the days, weeks and months move on.

MORE: The New York Times' editorial is headlined, "It's Not a 'Blame Game,'" and then concludes:

President Bush blithely announced at a photo-op cabinet meeting that he, personally, was going to "find out what went right and what went wrong." We can't imagine a worse idea.

No administration could credibly investigate such an immense failure on its own watch.

And for good measure, the piece throws in a reference to Abu Ghraib.

By Ed Moltzen  ·   7 September 2005
LINK  ·   Comments (0)
0

No Nukes

And thank you most of all for nuclear power, which is yet to cause a single proven fatality, at least in this country.

-- Homer Simpson

Common Sense and Wisdom has additional thoughts, now that it appears that the Chernobyl disaster wasn't what the world was told it was.

By Ed Moltzen  ·   5 September 2005
LINK  ·   Comments (0)   ·  TrackBack (0)
0

Strange Bedfellows

Oprah and Howard Stern: Co-workers?

By Ed Moltzen  ·   5 September 2005
LINK  ·   Comments (0)   ·  TrackBack (0)
0

Where's Your Plan?

Once final rescue and recovery efforts are completed in New Orleans and Mississippi, it might be a good time to look at the emergency management plan for your home town.

Here are a few:

San Francisco
Boston
Los Angeles
Dallas
Detroit (which has a 10-point plan!)
Chicago
Miami-Dade County
Philadelphia
Charlotte
Kansas City
New York City

And, if your city or local government doesn't have it posted online, you can obviously call and ask for their emergency management plan. And if they don't have one, obviously, that's another set of questions.

Even if you don't find one for where you live, there's still Ready.gov. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security was ridiculed for duct tape when it first rolled out its emergency planning guidelines, but those guidelines also had some common sense information like this:

Getting Away

There may be conditions under which you will decide to get away, or there may be situations when you are ordered to leave. Plan how you will assemble your family and anticipate where you will go. Choose several destinations in different directions so you have options in an emergency.

And there was much more detail on planning your personal evacuation that you can read.

But if where you live doesn't have a well-publicized, easy-to-understand emergency management plan - custom-tailored to the local geography and setting - now is the time to demand one. Not when there are bodies in the street.

For example, Long Island, N.Y., where between 3 million and 4 million people live, is doing more to publicize tax-free shopping week than its coastal evacuation routes in the middle of a hurricane season. (Although Nassau County does a much better job than Suffolk County.) They can now plan on hearing from at least one local resident about this first thing tomorrow morning.

Read the emergency management plans above. The quality plans stand out and if there is a pattern that seems to emerge it's that the cities that have had the unfortunate experience of managing a catastrophe seem to have the best plans in place. (Los Angeles, New York and San Francsico are good places to start.)

By Ed Moltzen  ·   5 September 2005
LINK  ·   Comments (1)   ·  TrackBack (0)
0

David Brooks' Bad Flashback

So, New York Times columnist David Brooks wants to compare the present state of affairs to the malaise of the 1970s.

Brooks is right to point out the number of inexcusable breakdowns in stepping up to the disaster in New Orleans and Mississippi. He is right to point out the putrid response of the government to a catastrophe that, unlike 9/11, the world knew was coming.

But Brooks portrays the events of this summer - and earlier - as watershed events pointing to leadership vacuum and social decay. He equates it with the 1970s.

Memo to David Brooks: Times have changed.

Mr. Brooks, We knew the 1970s. The 1970s were a friend of ours. Mr. Brooks, 2005 is no 1970s.

During the 1970s, there was corruption from the head to the core of American government. Not just the Nixon Administration, either. Remember Abscam?
Though Abscam reached a crescendo in 1980, the FBI sting against congressmen began two years earlier. Everybody then, it seemed, was on the take.

During the 1970s, the gas supply pipeline was so inadequate there were gas lines, Mr. Brooks. Rises in gas prices took a huge chunk out of the American economy - much more on an inflation-adjusted basis than today. In perusing Time Magazine's wonderful archive(subscription required), you can come across this anectdote from February, 1974:

Salvatore Butera, owner of a BP station in Trenton, N.J., signaled his distress in another way. New Jersey stations are now required by the state to put out various colored flags (red for no gas, yellow for limited sales, green for unlimited sales). Butera hoisted a white flag, explaining, "They got me beat any way I turn."

This week, when gasoline prices spiked by as much as 75 cents a gallon on Long Island, where driving is akin to breathing, there were small gas lines at the few stations that kept prices under $3 a gallon until midnight on Tuesday. By Tuesday morning, it was back to normal. No white flags, Mr. Brooks.

Mr. Brooks, you write:

Over the past few years, we have seen intelligence failures in the inability to prevent Sept. 11 and find W.M.D.'s in Iraq. We have seen incompetent postwar planning. We have seen the collapse of Enron and corruption scandals on Wall Street. We have seen scandals at our leading magazines and newspapers, steroids in baseball, the horror of Abu Ghraib.

In case you forgot, Mr. Brooks, Howard Dean, John Kerry and the rest of the Democratic party used most of those arguments hour by hour, day after day, month after month leading up to last November's presidential election. Sixty million Americans still voted for President Bush and sent him back to the White House. If ever there was a time for the collective American psyche to demonstrate a crisis in confidence it was then. But, unlike the 1970s, America was not inclined to put another Jimmy Carter in the White House.

You write:

Each institutional failure and sign of helplessness is another blow to national morale. The sour mood builds on itself, the outraged and defensive reaction to one event serving as the emotional groundwork for the next.

America has never been perfect. You talk about institutional failures. For daily aggravation and scandal back in the day: Remember 3-hour lines at the DMV? Remember $900 toilet seats at the Pentagon? Remember Serpico? Remember the joys of dealing with the phone company - a government-protected monopoly?

During the 1970s, the Cold War sapped our tax dollars and sent us on a race to what we were told would be nuclear oblivion. "How could anybody vote for Reagan?" a lot of people asked. "He'll just get us into a nuclear war with the Soviets." Remember the Soviets, Mr. Brooks? They don't exist anymore. But there was no Armageddon, and we've come to understand since then that Reagan, and America, was right to fight what was then a totally non-sensical war.

Only now we won't have to wait another fifteen or 20 years for validation on the Iraq war like we did with the Cold War. Saddam Hussein's trial starts soon. We'll hear a lot about his WMD attacks, torture and rape on his own people. Mr. Brooks, Stalin and Brezhnev never had to stand trial, with the world looking on in real time. Saddam does. All the institutional failures won't overshadow the larger truth on Iraq: America was right. And we won't have to wait for the history books to find that out.

You write:

As a result, it is beginning to feel a bit like the 1970's, another decade in which people lost faith in their institutions and lost a sense of confidence about the future.

"Rats on the West Side, bedbugs uptown/What a mess! This town's in tatters/I've been shattered," Mick Jagger sang in 1978.

How dare you? How dare you? Besides the fact that you Dowdified the quote (The lyrics also note of New York: "Don't you know the crime rate is going up, up, up, up, up/To live in this town you must be tough, tough, tough, tough, tough!"), you don't get out as much in Manhattan as you ought to.

Granted, you write for The New York Times, but you could still step out of the building and take a look at New York City once in a while. The rat population on the West Side ain't what it used to be, Mr. Brooks. The town's not in tatters. New York was once a model of American social and urban decay. The Bronx was burning, to hearken back to Howard Cosell. It's now, quite possibly, one of the cleanest, safest big cities in the world. We were wrong about New York's ability to rebound during the 1970s, and we remember how wrong we were. When it comes to rebuilding, New Orleans can look to New York and take heart.

You write:

Katrina means that the political culture, already sour and bloody-minded in many quarters, will shift. There will be a reaction. There will be more impatience for something new. There is going to be some sort of big bang as people respond to the cumulative blows of bad events and try to fundamentally change the way things are.

There has already been a reaction, Mr. Brooks. It came in the form of the ridiculous Kanye West. See how far that goes. And the angry Left has never stopped reacting since the 2000 recount. It's white noise to most Americans.

One more thought about the 1970s, Mr. Brooks. Hurricane Agnes ravaged the East Coast in 1972. People died. Thousands were left homeless. Pennsylvania was submerged. Did the American spirit - the spirit you suggest has been left in tatters, a la Mick Jagger - come anywhere near as close as this kind of response?

After the "crisis in confidence" and malaise of the 1970s, Ronald Reagan taught us something that everyone should remember. When it comes to America, the best is yet to come.

Save the bad 1970s flashbacks for TVLand.

By Ed Moltzen  ·   4 September 2005
LINK  ·   Comments (0)
0

Two Americas

During the past week, many, people have done unbelievable work after the path of destruction left by Hurricane Katrina.

Many, many people have written about it, as well: those who were there and those who were not.

And then there is John Edwards. Yesterday, he sent out a note to his political supporters which read, in part:

During the campaign of 2004, I spoke often of the two Americas: the America of the privileged and the wealthy, and the America of those who lived from paycheck to paycheck. I spoke of the difference in the schools, the difference in the loan rates, the difference in opportunity. All of that pales today. Today - and for many days and weeks and months to follow - we see a harsher example of two Americas. We see the poor and working class of New Orleans who don't own a car and couldn't evacuate to hotels or families far from the target of Katrina.

There are two Americas: One for those interested in abhorrent opportunism, and one you can read about here and here.

There are also two stories: The story of those whose eyes are focused on what the government is or isn't doing. And the other of those whose eyes are focused on what Americans are doing and not doing.

Americans seem to be doing quite a bit.

By Ed Moltzen  ·   3 September 2005
LINK  ·   Comments (0)   ·  TrackBack (0)
0