![]() |
|
One 'Deep Throat' Question
Now that everybody knows the identity of "Deep Throat," will John Dean be making any phone calls of apology to Earl Silbert or Alexander Haig? By Ed Moltzen · 31 May 2005
Getting It On Gitmo
Some folks were giddy at Timesman Thomas Friedman's call for the U.S. to shut down the terrorist jail at Guantanamo Bay. David B. Rivkin Jr. & Lee A. Casey, at The Corner, were not: If we have evidence against any of the detainees, (Friedman) suggests, we should "put them on trial, convict as many [as] possible (which will not be easy because of bungled interrogations) and then simply let the rest go home or to a third country. Sure, a few may come back to haunt us." What a charming way to describe it--a few may come back to haunt us. For al Qaeda, of course, haunting does not involve shouting boo in the night. It involves arranging matters so that scores of our fellow citizens must choose between burning to death and jumping 100 stories to the pavement. Some people do remember Sept. 11. By Ed Moltzen · 31 May 2005
Every Move You Make
New York City is set to roll out 400 video surveillance cameras all throughout the Big Apple. Only 400? Video cameras don't stop 100 percent of all crimes, obviously, but stories like this can have an impact: PHILADELPHIA -- A woman on her way to work was shot in the back of the head by a man who followed her from a bus stop, a killing recorded by post office surveillance cameras. The killing of Patricia McDermott has Philadelphia shaken up like few crimes can impact a major city, and her killer is still on the loose. But the chances are good her killer will be caught and will spend the rest of his life in prison because a camera recorded his actions, and a judge and jury would be hard-pressed to show him any mercy. MORE: Some folks think having that many video cameras might be "scary." Could that be any scarier than this? By Ed Moltzen · 31 May 2005
Another Spring Ends
You can tell by the sound of helicopters moving from east to west over Long Island that the privileged are ending their Memorial Day weekend and leaving the Hamptons for Manhattan. In other places spring ends, with prayers, thanks and remembrance of brave Americans who gave their lives for their country. And it's especially poignant during a time of war. And what American troops fight and die for today is no less important than during the Revolution, the Civil War, or any war during the 20th Century. As another spring ends, it's hard not to still feel the effects. How many Little League games this spring, in the D.C. or New York metro areas, had little kids playing without a mother or father watching them hit and catch - games missed because a bunch of bloodthirsty maggots couldn't stand American freedom? How many weddings were missed, graduations missed, retirement parties missed this spring? Hundreds? Thousands? Another spring comes to an end and lives move on, but it's not like it used to be. It never will be. Which is why it makes it hard to understand why some whiney snots seem to root harder for the bad guys than for the good. Those who are in jail at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, made a choice. They chose to get in line behind Osama bin Laden, and fight for him, and try to kill American soldiers. They chose to try and further the aims and goals of a mass murderer. And don't forget, at the very time bin Laden was declaring war on us and planning the 9/11 attacks, Saddam Hussein was offering him asylum in Iraq. James Wolcott is Ted Rall without the charm. He writes, "Gitmo in its present utility is an abomination and a stain upon what little honor the US has left under Bush." The people held in custody at Guantanamo Bay want us all dead. They want mothers and fathers of Little League kids dead. And they want the kids dead, too. They took up arms against, and even killed, brave American men and women who risk all to protect the country. Just who is it that lacks honor? Another spring comes to an end. By now, thankfully, most Americans know the answer. By Ed Moltzen · 30 May 2005
When Another George Fought For Freedom
But it's not just evident from today's headlines. David McCullough, in his new book, 1776, does what McCullough does best: takes an important story of historical import and makes it as urgent as ever. In 1776, McCullough provides a unique look at this country's brush with death at the same it was just being born. From Boston to New York, Brooklyn and Long Island to Trenton, George Washington's rag-tag army barely held off the British long enough to give the republic a start. Along the way, McCullough writes, Washington made tactical errors, was sometimes slow to decisions, and found himself brutally criticized by men who were supposed to be on the same side. He commanded an army of "rabble" - as the British called them - who were weary from loss, hunger, sickness and were called upon to fight for freedom at a pay of $6 per month. 1776 is a page-turner. Especially for those from the New York area, the book provides a rare look at the role the region played in the battle for freedom - a look at New Yorkers of the era that's far from complimentary. And from one losing battle to another, Washington was faced with heavy criticism and second-guessing from some of his highest-ranking and most trusted officers. Still he carried on, worried all the while that the effort of the rebel army was doomed after a humiliating defeat to the redcoats in New York. When McCullough finds an American leader and spends much time and effort writing about him - as with Harry Truman and John Adams - the result is usually a page-turning look at a human being forced by history into heroics. And with George Washington in 1776, the same could be said. He writes. Without Washington's leadership and unrelenting perseverence, the revolution almost certainly would have failed. As (General) Nathanael Green foresaw as the war went on, "He will be the deliverer of his own country." And he was - whining, chirping and defeats aside. By Ed Moltzen · 30 May 2005
Built on What?
The fact is that the war on terror is built on a pyramid of lies that has produced a pile of skull climbing ever higher. All this time, a lot of people thought the war on terror was built on this. By Ed Moltzen · 27 May 2005
Desecration Versus Liberation
Juan Williams interviewed Secretary of State Rice on National Public Radio, and this exchange happened:
Also, she told Williams that Karen Hughes' nomination to be undersecretary of state for diplomacy remains on track - a move that could further get that message out. By Ed Moltzen · 27 May 2005
BBs In The Sun
It's unclear what could be the possible motivation for this crime:
In a word: Ouch. By Ed Moltzen · 27 May 2005
Imus is Still On The Air?
Don Imus still has a radio program that is simulcast on MSNBC, even with programming that mocks breast cancer victims. Will folks like Sen. Christopher Dodd and Chris Matthews and other "inside the Beltway" types still prop up programming like this by appearing on it regularly? It might be better if Imus went back to pretending to blow up high schools like he did in the '70s... MORE: The Imus' show sports reporter who made the remark was fired. But reasonable people might wonder why responsibility for this doesn't go a little bit higher up the food chain... By Ed Moltzen · 26 May 2005
Over The Shoulder
Derek Jeter is officially launching his own web site. (There's no blog. Half the content is about his baseball, the other half about his Turn 2 Foundation.) By the way, MLB.com has video of his over-the-shoulder catch last night against the Tigers, which was one of the best fielding plays of the year so far by anyone. By Ed Moltzen · 26 May 2005
Safe But Weird
Just because Long Island is safe, doesn't mean it lacks the potential to completely weird you out: (05/24/05) DIX HILLS – Half Hollow Hills School District officials have warned parents about two incidents in which a man with an apparent foot fetish approached two girls in a residential neighborhood. By Ed Moltzen · 25 May 2005
Getting Ready For "Free" Elections
Iran's President Khatami put out a statement this week in an effort to get his government ready for "free" elections. Among other things, the statement said this: The country's disciplinary, law enforcement, and military forces, including the Islamic Republic Guard Corps (IRGC), the IRI Army, and the beloved Basij (mobilization force), should abide by the country's laws and refrain from any type of moves that might be interpreted as interference in any phase of the elections. It's as if Khatami is worried, for some reason. By Ed Moltzen · 25 May 2005
Headline Of The Day
From a press release: Clarification: Miss America 2005 Deidre Downs Is Not Hosting Nor Associated With the Miss 500 Hawaiian Tropic Pageant in Indianapolis When beauty pageants collide... By Ed Moltzen · 24 May 2005
A Distraction From The War On Terror
Out of Centcom so far this week: BAGHDAD RAIDS NET 22 TERROR SUSPECTS, WEAPONS, $6 MILLION OPERATION SQUEEZE PLAY NETS 285 SUSPECTS ON FIRST DAY These terrorists are the same types of people who took part in the Sept. 11 attacks, blew up a train in Madrid, and set off car bombs and nightclub bombs. And President Bush said yesterday: I think they're being defeated. And that's why they continue to fight. The worst thing for them is to see democracy... The worst problem that an ideologue that uses terror to try to get their way is to see a free society emerge. And I'm confident we're making great progress in Iraq. By Ed Moltzen · 24 May 2005
Safe At Home
Long Island: Expensive but safe. It's unclear, though, whether the "safety" rating includes instances of road rage... By Ed Moltzen · 23 May 2005
Blip?
This may just be a blip, but Rasmussen Reports shows that President Bush's approval ratings are up to 52 percent. Rasmussen also finds 57 percent of those polled back a change to the filibuster rule in the Senate, for judicial nominees. By Ed Moltzen · 23 May 2005
If You Feel Good, You Look Good
Allure Magazine: 9 Out of 10 Women are Actually Happy With What They See in the Mirror It's unknown, though, whether these women were included in the survey. By Ed Moltzen · 23 May 2005
Getting It Wrong Means Never Having To Say You're Sorry?
Via 60 Minutes consultant Josh Marshall, we see that Kevin Drum, who spent a fair amount of time last year putting Bill Burkett forward as a news source in the Bush-National Guard story, is not really happy that Newsweek apologized for a false report that U.S. soldiers flushed a Koran down the toilet: Newsweek and the rest of the media need to get up off their knees and start fighting back. They've done enough apologizing. He doesn't say who he believes the media needs to "start fighting back" against. Or if the media should fight back against the Bush Administration the same way it fought back against Saddam Hussein. By Ed Moltzen · 22 May 2005
"Sources Said" -- A Dying Attribution?
Newsweek's chairman, in a letter to readers, says the news magazine is going to make it We will raise the standards for the use of anonymous sources throughout the magazine. Historically, unnamed sources have helped to break or advance stories of great national importance, but overuse can lead to distrust among readers and carelessness among journalists. As always, the burden of proof should lie with the reporters and their editors to show why a promise of anonymity serves the reader. From now on, only the editor or the managing editor, or other top editors they specifically appoint, will have the authority to sign off on the use of an anonymous source. He adds: "The cryptic phrase 'sources said' will never again be the sole attribution for a story in NEWSWEEK." Since this is coming from a magazine owned by The Washington Post company, which turned the moniker "Deep Throat" from a porno title into a journalistic milestone, it seems to be pretty historic. By Ed Moltzen · 22 May 2005
NY Times Correction du Jour
The dreaded "editor's note" strikes again: Editors' Note, Travel Embarrassing enough, but this web site notes that the Westin at Yorktown Center is set to open in 2006, not 2007. By Ed Moltzen · 22 May 2005
The You-Know-What-Bomb
An old colleague was once getting ready for a live appearance on a cable TV news program and was given this advice, minutes before airtime: "Whatever you do, don't think of the word f**k." The poor guy struggled through a five-minute appearance on the brink of letting the mother-of-all-four-letter-words fly into the microphone. (He didn't.) Arthur Chi'en, a reporter for WCBS TV, wasn't so lucky. Here's a video of how he reacted when a couple of Opie & Anthony fans snuck behind him during a live remote last week. Upshot: they annoyed Chi'en, and afterward, when he thought he was off-air but was really on-air, he let them have it. He used a dirty word. So management canned him. Allan Sniffen, who runs the New York Radio Message Board, wasn't amused by the O&A fans' stunt: Should the reporter have known better? Yes. But... the guy lost his job because he was put in a position that I'm willing to bet most any of us would have responded to in the same way. So now he's out of work because these two morons interfered with his broadcast. And those two morons were encouraged, indirectly, by O&A. But if you make your living by going on television live, in front of tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands or millions of people, you really should be able to keep your cool. And, whatever you do, don't think of the word "f**k." By Ed Moltzen · 22 May 2005
Quote of the Day
"It sounds like Ice Cube has tourettes syndrome." By Ed Moltzen · 21 May 2005
Remember The Mass Murder And War Crimes, Anyone?
A running theme on the stories about publication of Saddam Hussein's underwear photos: they don't seem mention why Saddam is in jail in the first place until the jump page. This story, on MSNBC, takes 27 paragraphs to mention that Saddam Hussein is a mass murderer. This story, on CNN, takes 21 paragraphs to quote Secretary of State Rice reminding people that Saddam Hussein is accused of serious war crimes. This New York Times piece, in the 16th paragraph, quotes the editor of the British tabloid The Sun as noting Saddam has been charged with murderous war crimes. The L.A. Times notes, in the seventh paragraph of its story, that Saddam is set to be tried on war crimes, possibly this year. This Boston Globe story, again relying on the Sun's editor's quotation, doesn't mention Saddam's war crimes until the 20th paragraph. ABCNews.com, in the 13th paragraph of this story, relies on a quote from a Saddam critic to point out that the former Iraqi dictator is responsible for mass murder. This Washington Post story mentions in the 16th paragraph that Saddam is on track to be tried for war crimes. This CBS News-AP story gets around to mentioning Saddam's past of torture - by quoting someone talking about the Kuwaiti reaction to the photos - in the 14th paragraph. Would it be particularly difficult to refer to Saddam, on first reference, as "the accused mass-murderer awaiting trial for war crimes?" Or, perhaps, on second reference? Or third reference? Or does collective amnesia about Saddam's bloody, torturous past not go away until fourteen paragraphs? The fact that Saddam murdered and tortured hundreds of thousands of people seems to be only secondary to the fact that he's been publicly pantsed. By Ed Moltzen · 21 May 2005
Joan Didion on Schiavo
Just when the Terri Schiavo case has begun to fade into memory, Joan Didon takes the whole, sordid story on in a piece in the New York Review of Books. Not quite someone who could be described as a theocon or religious fanatic, Didion's piece is largely unsympathetic to the efforts to let Schiavo die: (Imagine it. You are in your early twenties. You are watching a movie, say on Lifetime, in which someone has a feeding tube. You pick up the empty chip bowl. "No tubes for me," you say as you get up to fill it. What are the chances you have given this even a passing thought?) Most commentators nonetheless seemed inclined to regard Theresa Schiavo's "directive" as a matter of record, even as they undercut their own assumption by reminding us that the "lesson" in the case was "to sit down tonight and write your living will." It's a lengthy piece, but, like just about anything Didion writes, worth reading. MORE: From Blincoln Blog: "Didion gets past the talking points and from reading it I am able to look at the case in a whole new light." Aspazia says, "Didion points out that at the heart of the case over Terry Schiavo were serious moral questions that neither side engaged, particularly because they were overshadowed by previous political maneouverings: the absolute defense of life or the right to die." By Ed Moltzen · 21 May 2005
Dignity
Saddam Hussein's dignity has been attacked. Forgive some people if they don't get too upset. People, like relatives of the hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis who were indiscriminately murdered and thrown into mass graves. For all the debate over the war, for the talk of WMD, and whether WMD was the reason the U.S. went to war, people have seemed to stopped talking about one fact: Saddam Hussein is the worst living mass murderer, and the worst mass murderer on the planet since Pol Pot. He can't murder anybody now, and he will probably be executed at some point in the future. He has stopped filling mass graves. Now there are also reports about U.S. troops torturing al Qaeda prisoners of war. Though the military says evidence suggests the torture of al Qaeda members or Taliban was isolated, the New York Times reports: Yet the Bagram file includes ample testimony that harsh treatment by some interrogators was routine and that guards could strike shackled detainees with virtual impunity. Prisoners considered important or troublesome were also handcuffed and chained to the ceilings and doors of their cells, sometimes for long periods, an action Army prosecutors recently classified as criminal assault. Criminal assault is bad. Just like it was bad when al Qaeda did this. And this. And this. And this. And this. And this. And this. And this. And this. And planned to do the unimaginable. And actually did the unimaginable. With clear intent. For those of you keeping track... By Ed Moltzen · 21 May 2005
I See London, I see France...
By Ed Moltzen · 20 May 2005
Thanks Roger, See You In Cooperstown
Mike Lupica, who has been "on" lately when it comes to the Yankees, brings up all the Roger Clemens-back-to-New York talk and asks: Say everybody involved does want this to happen in July. What do the Yankees give up to get a guy who is the best pitcher in the sport right now, even at the age of 42? What do they have that Houston wants? Do they give up Robinson Cano, perhaps the first middle infielder produced by their farm system since Derek Jeter? Do they trade Chien-Ming Wang, who has a chance to be the first starter they have developed since Pettitte was a kid? Just when their farm system seems to have produced at least snapshots of an actual future, do the Yankees trade it away? These are just rhetorical questions. The answer: No. You don't give up Robinson Cano or Chien-Ming Wang for two months of Clemens, to see him leave the Yankees for "one more last hurrah" with Boston next year. The Astros decided to shell out megabucks to steal Clemens and Andy Pettitte. Now let the Astros choke on that budget. By Ed Moltzen · 18 May 2005
It's Not Nice To Mock Someone's Bumper Sticker Argument
Duncan Black and others are not happy that pro-Iraq War conservatives have co-opted their bumper-sticker phraseology by saying, "Newsweek Lied, People Died." Others see more important ramifications. By Ed Moltzen · 16 May 2005
10 Million Served
At some point over the past several hours, Technorati began tracking its 10 millionth blog. Jeff Jarvis may want to update this chart, which was put together during the blogging Middle Ages of, um, July. By Ed Moltzen · 16 May 2005
Manners For The Senator
Sen. Hillary Clinton gave a commencement address today, and, though reports are early, there are no indications she was insulted by any of the students. By Ed Moltzen · 14 May 2005
Help Wanted
Al Qaeda just can't seem to retain a top operations guy these days. By Ed Moltzen · 14 May 2005
A New Prism On 9/11
He is also one of the few novelists with the guts to take on the 9/11 attacks in story form, pull it off with dignity, and produce a story worth reading twice. In Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close, Foer tells the story of Oskar Schell, a quirky, 9-year old boy whose father, Thomas, died in the World Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001. Telling the story through the eyes of a nine-year old victim could have turned the whole thing into a cheap tearjerker. But Foer is better than that. Oskar Schell doesn't make you feel any worse about the worst attack against Americans ever, or the lives left destroyed in its wake. (By this point, who could?) But Foer's Oskar provides a new point of view, a new prism through which to look at it and process it all. Alternating between hysterically funny and deeply sad, Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close presents a series of only-in-New York characters, including a 103-year old former war correspondent who has shut himself inside his apartment for decades following his wife's death. (The plot takes Oskar on a journey through all of New York in search of clues to his father's death, a search that seems impossible but one in which the little boy is determined to finish.) Foer also gives us the story of Oskar's equally quirky grandparents, who are survivors of the World War II bombing of Dresden. A back-and-forth switch in narrative to show wartime human suffering could have come across as forced; Foer does it naturally. It's odd, then, to see some Foer's work written off so badly. Take this remark by the Washington Post’s Michael Dirda: Nope, haven't read him. Lamentably, I've now reached the age where I find it hard to believe I can learn anything from someone in his early to mid twenties. Lamentable? Maybe. Lame? Probably. In this case, it takes twenty-something Foer to do a terrific job of capturing the point of view of a nine-year old. And if you can't learn from a 9-year old, you can't learn. By Ed Moltzen · 13 May 2005
Cheeseburger On Satellite
Sirius Satellite Radio is launching Radio Margaritaville: Jimmy Buffett and SIRIUS are teaming up to bring you a true taste of radio paradise: Radio Margaritaville. Sirius already has a stream, "Vacation," that plays nothing but "vacation music," including a lot of Jimmy Buffett stuff. There's overlap all over the place on Sirius - for crying out loud, they have Patrick Swayze's godawful single from the "Dirty Dancing" sound track in heavy rotation on about four streams. The good news is that there is such a wide selection of streams focusing on different genres that even if a small percentage of its programming sucks, there's enough else that's really good that it pretty much doesn't matter. And if an all-Jimmy Buffett station doesn't work, Sirius will probably need a stream for its all-Christmas music station starting sometime after Labor Day... By Ed Moltzen · 13 May 2005
Be Careful Where You Spit
This was just sent out via email by Tom Hughes from Democracy for America: Whatever happened to good corporate citizenship? Just one problem: Guess which Democratic U.S. senator was a member of Wal-Mart's board of directors when much of its current corporate strategy was solidified and placed into motion? If you need a hint, just click here. By Ed Moltzen · 12 May 2005
The Day The Music Died
It was forgotten here, but not at the New York Radio Message Board: Yesterday was the anniversary of 77 WABC-AM radio's move from "Music Radio WABC" to a talk radio format. American culture said goodbye to successful, Top 40 radio and hello to Rush Limbaugh, Bob Grant and successful talk radio. This may not be a huge milestone for many people. But if you still remember well listening to "MacArthur Park" by Donna Summer on a crackly, transistor AM radio, you might have a different appreciation. By Ed Moltzen · 11 May 2005
Attempt on Bush's Life
The bad news: There was an attempt on President Bush's life today. The good news: they used Soviet technology. By Ed Moltzen · 10 May 2005
John Rocker
By Ed Moltzen · 10 May 2005
The .195 Man
Mike Lupica rightly takes on the disgrace that is Jason Giambi: After last night's game against the Mariners, Giambi is hitting .195. Three home runs, six RBI. His salary for this season is $15.5 million. It goes to $19 million next season. In total, if you count what the Yankees have already paid Giambi for his .195 batting average, he is still on the books for around $81 million. At the present time, the Yankees couldn't give him away. Here's an idea: release him. Cut him loose. Have him and his ever-present personal fitness coach clean out his locker and hit the road. And then, with Steinbrenner's money, launch the biggest, most thorough, complete investigation into Giambi that a ballplayer has ever faced (yes, and that includes the Howie Spira-Dave Winfield stunt that tarnished the Yankees for a few years in the '80s.) Gather up as much evidence as possible. Put everything you get into a nice, neat lawsuit and have the lawyers tell the judge that Giambi voided his contract. And, not only will they not pay the remaining $81 million Giambi is due, they want all the money they've already paid him given back. If the San Francisco Chronicle was incorrect in reporting Giambi's grand jury testimony - in which he admitted using steroids - Giambi would have one heck of a libel lawsuit. To date, there are no reports he has filed a libel lawsuit. If the San Francisco Chronicle was correct, than Giambi should reach a simple settlement with the Yankees and join a beer league somewhere. By Ed Moltzen · 10 May 2005
NY Times Correction du Jour
An obituary on Friday about Col. David H. Hackworth, a war hero and later a critic of the Vietnam War, misidentified two units he commanded and the helicopters used by American forces in Vietnam. The Wolfhound Raiders were a platoon he led in Korea, not a regiment. In Vietnam, he commanded a battalion of the 101st Airborne Division, not an air cavalry brigade; that battalion flew Huey helicopters, not Black Hawks. They spelled his name correctly... By Ed Moltzen · 10 May 2005
When Celebrities And Millionaires And Intelligentsia "Blog."
Most of the new Huffington Post blog is a yawner. (Someone needs to offer some of those folks lessons on stuff like "linking" and "quoting" - things the blogging little people care about.) But credit where credit is due: Richard Bradley taking a swipe at Hilary Rosen is a fun read. By Ed Moltzen · 9 May 2005
Party-ology
Vanity Fair scribe James Wolcott is taking potshots at The National Review for hosting an expensive cocktail party in Atlanta. I hope the NRO crew are prepared for what will greet them once they deboard from the chartered Peter Pan bus with the special pinochle table in the rear. They should be made aware that there are a lot of black people in Atlanta. We're still waiting for his critique of Graydon Carter's annual Vanity Fair Oscar party, and the racial breakdown of its West Hollywood setting. For those who are interested: There aren't a lot of black people where Vanity Fair holds its big bash. Some 3.09 percent of West Hollywood residents are "Black or African-American," according to this breakdown. By Ed Moltzen · 8 May 2005
Quack Quack
From the New York Radio Message Board, here's an interesting view on Don Imus. Key quote: "So what have we here? Quality broadcaster, philanthropist and yes also a dirtbag of a human being." By Ed Moltzen · 8 May 2005
Meet The Fokker
Barbra Streisand is writing again! America was profoundly changed after the September 11 attacks. We went from a country motivated by hope to a country controlled by fear. For the last several years, feeling neither safe nor secure, Americans have lived in extreme anxiety of another impending terrorist attack. There's another way to look at it: we don't want to be nuked by Islamist madmen. I think that as a result, most Americans sought out their faith and reaffirmed their conviction in God. And others scoffed and mocked. President Bush and the Religious Right's greatest political weapon has been perpetuating fear. Because of the heightened climate of anxiety coupled with religious fervor, they have been successful in stripping Americans of their personal freedoms, suppressing dissent and winning elections based on moral values. Dissent has been suppressed, except for liberal advertisements comparing Bush to Hitler; a top Democrat, during war time, calling the president "the enemy;" a major liberal radio personality suggesting the president meet a violent end; the U.S. Senate's top Democrat calling President Bush "a loser;" a minority in the Senate effectively blocking all of President Bush's judicial nominees even though a majority would approve them; a truth-challenged filmmaker who reaped millions and millions and millions of dollars at the box office putting out a feature-length, anti-Bush movie (It grossed even more than Yentl!); and far-left Political Action Committees that raised tens upon tens upon tens of millions of dollars in an effort to throw President Bush out of office. Except for that, dissent has been amazingly crushed by the President Bush and the religious right. I also think the unfathomable fear of being a victim of another terrorist attack has allowed for the crumbling of the wall between church and state, which is a vital part of our historical, legal and political heritage. Actually, the crumbling of the wall between church and state began with the emergence of radical theocrats who put forth the argument that the government has to rely on religion if the Republic is to survive. Yes, radical theocrats like, well, George Washington. By allowing personal religious beliefs to infiltrate our political framework, we have enabled this administration to wage a war on women's reproductive rights, squelch scientific advancement, take away our freedom of speech and fill important positions within government and possibly the nation's highest courts with religious extremists. We must not let fear cripple our democracy. By "war on women's reproductive rights," she might be referring to the ban on partial-birth abortion, which would not have become law had not 16 Democrats voted to impose it. Bush's actions to manipulate the country using fear remind me of Franklin D. Roosevelt's brilliant quote "there is nothing to fear but fear itself." Roosevelt also had another, lesser-known quote: "The U.S. Supreme Court is getting in my way, so I'll try to radically alter the third branch of government to undercut its authority and get my way, the U.S. Constitution be damned." Well, FDR never actually said those words, but he tried to do it nonetheless. The Bush administration, capitalizing on the horror of 9/11, had the perfect opportunity to wage a war under false pretenses and four years after 9/11, get away with failing to properly secure our borders, ports, airplanes and nuclear power plants. "Capitalizing on the horror of 9/11?" How dare she? Not only that, but she's using an argument made by John Kerry that sent 60 million Americans to the polls for President Bush. I have written before how this administration could have and should have prevented 9/11 by not ignoring all the threats we were given, or even by beefing up airline cockpit doors. The U.S. continues to be isolated from the international community and thousands of young American soldiers have senselessly been killed and injured. Despite all of the Administration's mistakes and shortcomings, Bush was re-elected by the American people (regardless of the many accounts of possible voter fraud). The voter fraud argument has essentially become a fashion statement among the in-denial, angry left. Apparently, some still think it's not yet out of style. People are unable to recognize they are being manipulated when they are paralyzed by fear because their government is constantly reminding them of an impending terrorist attack. During the 2004 election, every time John Kerry's poll numbers elevated, the government announced a new terror alert and people were once again forced to face the orange color code. Script! People get her a script! The suspicious-terror-alert conspiracy was replaced by the Swift Boat "liar" conspiracy, followed by the Jesusland conspiracy. She's out of date by two conspiracies. The administration has spent more time trying to keep the people frightened, rather than focusing on securing our country. Only last week were lighters banned from airplanes, yet it has been a full 3 * years since "Richard Reed" tried to light his shoe bomb on fire with a match, while aboard an American Airlines flight to Miami. Even though lighters are now banned, matches are still permissible on airplanes. This is merely one example among many of how slow the Bush administration has reacted when presented with an opportunity to make Americans more secure. Well, the Bush Administration may have been delayed in keeping terrorists from bringing lighters on planes because they've been, well, too busy working with allies to kill and capture the terrorists before they get on planes. President Bush continues to maintain that he is doing everything in his power to make America safer. Thus far most of the country continues to accept this fallacy. Bush's actions remind me of Herman Goering's quote during the Nuremberg Trials, Maybe she is right about crushing of dissent. The president's opponents aren't comparing him to Hitler any more; they've demoted the comparison to lower-ranking Nazis... where he stated: "...it's always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders...all you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism..." Or, if you live in thuggish dictatorships seeking to align with terrorists, you can simply just kill everybody who disagrees with you. By Ed Moltzen · 7 May 2005
Save Some For The Rest Of Us
Some people could be perfectly happy to walk away from gambling after taking a penny slot machine for a million bucks. Not Jo Ann Argyris, who continued to play the game after striking the jackpot last year. The other night, she had dropped $35 into the same slot machine that made her a millionaire and:
"I wanted to get home to watch CSI and was getting ready to cash out when the Millioni$er popped up again," Argyris said. "The Grand Jackpot was the eighth jackpot that I had hit and I didn't even realize I'd won the million until my daughter told me. I said 'no' and then I looked at the machine, said 'oh my goodness,' and put my head into my lap and cried!" Oh, my goodness. By Ed Moltzen · 7 May 2005
The Misunderestimators Strike Again
There they go again, misunderestimating President Bush. Just a quick recap of a few news items from this week week that take on a different meaning when held under the same light: Jobs. Another 274,000 jobs were added to the economy last month, and - oops! - the feds said they undercounted the number of jobs created in February and March, too. It may not be the right time to sing "Let The Good Times Roll," but the U.S. economy remains a strong one - strong enough to weather high oil and gas prices. Politics. President Bush is standing behind fellow Texan Tom DeLay, and, lo and behold, Democrats are now finding themselves having to answer the same types of questions on ethics that DeLay has been having to answer. Iraq. Terrorists continue killing innocent people, but guess who's not afraid? The Iraqi people. They managed to swear in a new government days ahead of schedule. This is another mile marker that the president said would be reached, and it was reached ahead of schedule. Terrorism. Abu al Zarqawi has lost a leg, lost a laptop and, oh yeah, he lost a war. No wonder his troops are complaining about low morale. At least he still has his health. Wait, on second thought, he may have some trouble there, too. Conditions aren't that much better for Zarqawi's colleagues in Afghanistan and Pakistan. If Osama bin Laden feels an odd sensation on the back of his neck, there's a good chance it's the breath of American G.I.s or Pakistani soldiers. Or both. The economy is still strong and we're continuing to win important battles in the war on terror. If that makes President Bush "a loser," America's enemies better hope he doesn't start winning. By Ed Moltzen · 6 May 2005
The Hillary Meter, etc.
Sen. Clinton's liberal rating is dropping, according to Rasmussen Reports' Hillary Meter: Today's Hillary Meter shows that perceptions of the New York Senator have inched back to the right over the past two weeks. Meanwhile, the new anti-Hillary Clinton website, Hillcap, got some attention when it launched earlier this week. The site's publisher, Clinton-supporter-turned-antagonist Peter Paul, has much of interest on the site: a recap of the controversial 2000 fundraiser in L.A. that's the focus of a federal investigation; photos of Sen. Clinton with key people in the scandal; and a PDF of his own civil complaint against the Clinton campaign. What's unclear is whether he has any convincing evidence New York's junior senator actually knew of any wrongdoing. By Ed Moltzen · 6 May 2005
The Commercial Channel
Sirius Satellite Radio is reportedly getting ready to launch an all-commercial radio stream: The BMW Channel. Included in the 18 hours of infomercial programming will be "the best driving songs of all time." Gimmicky, maybe, but it's one way to get the brand in front of an audience. The best driving songs? Sounds like a list that's been published recently somewhere. By Ed Moltzen · 6 May 2005
More On NYC Bombings
Speculation that the IRA or al Qaeda could have been involved in this morning's bombing outside the British Consulate is now taking a back seat to a new suspect: CNN is reporting a Dutch national U.N. weapons inspection analyst is facing some questions. There did seem to be concern at the U.N. this morning after the bombings; that concern might now be focused just as much on public relations as perimeter security. MORE: Fox News has identified the U.N. employee as Eric Van Schijndel, who was involved in satellite surveillence efforts on behalf of U.N. weapons inspectors in Iraq. A Google search for Eric Van Schijndel and UNMOVIC turns up this, in which he is quoted in May 2003 as saying of the inspections and subsequent action in Iraq, "In my opinion, good work was done, and I think that if I say I am not totally happy with the present situation in Iraq, I am not the only one." Since millions of people opposed the Iraq war, the remark, of course, is evidence of nothing. Eric Van Schijndel could be in line to become the next Richard Jewel; unlike Saddam Hussein's Iraq, he is innocent until proven guilty. So far, the Fox report indicates the only suspicious activity Van Schijndel engaged in was that he was near the blast site after the bombs went off. The FBI or NYPD would need to do much better than that to even schedule a lineup. The bombings did take place outside the British Consulate on the day of U.K. elections, and Prime Minister Tony Blair - who helped lead the war effort - is the projected winner. MORE: CNN says Van Schijndel was only briefly detained and is not a suspect. By Ed Moltzen · 5 May 2005
Bombing in New York
Early reports have that two improvised explosive devices went off in front of the British Consulate early this morning. Reports from a variety of sources indicate police have set up a 10-block frozen zone starting at Third Avenue in Manhattan. Traffic is still in the early stages, but there were no outward signs of bad snarling...yet. MORE: Here's a live web cam stream from Times Square, about 12-14 blocks from the bombings. Looks like a typical work day in the Big Apple.
First thoughts: This doesn't look like al Qaeda since the blasts went off at a time when it was obvious nobody would be hurt. (And don't for a minute think the IRA would do anything in New York City, which is where it has drawn a lot of sympathy and support in years past.) MORE: WNBC-TV in New York is reporting there were 17 video surveillance cameras in the area of the bombings, and police are scrutinizing them now. By Ed Moltzen · 5 May 2005
Terrorist Brain Captured
By Ed Moltzen · 4 May 2005
Stable Droppings
President Mohammad Khatami on Tuesday described Iran as the most stable and secure country in world's most critical part and said the completion of big projects indicated Iran's confidence in its stable conditions. From Al Jazeera: Iran to U.S.: N. program is "none of your business" Threatening a super power with a weapon of mass destruction may not quite be the way to promote long-term stability for one's country, or one's political career. By Ed Moltzen · 4 May 2005
What A Difference An Election Year Makes
Here's a screen shot of the Manhattan District Attorney's Office web site from last year. Here's a screen shot of the Manhattan District Attorney's Office web site from today, as D.A. Robert Morganthau prepares for a tough re-election fight. For those of you unfamiliar with New York politics, the second screen shot includes a photo of Morganthau square in the middle of the page. Morganthau's opponent in the Democratic primary is Judge Leslie "Lock-Them-Up-And-Throw-Away-The-Key" Crocker Snyder. It might be better for Morganthau if he didn't try to play "dueling head shots" with his rival. |