Late Final
Late Final
Search for    
NY Times Correction Du Jour

Um, an editing lapse?

Because of an editing error, an article on July 15 about an official British report that criticized the country's prewar intelligence on Iraq misstated one finding of a parallel report released the previous week by the United States Senate Intelligence Committee. Like the British report, the Senate report traced several sources that appeared to substantiate claims that Iraq had sought to buy uranium from Niger; the Senate report did not find that the claims were based on a single set of forged documents. This correction was delayed by an editing lapse. (Go to article.)

By Ed Moltzen  ·  26 August 2004
  ·  TrackBack (0)
0

Comments
Post a comment












Remember personal info?