![]() |
|
NY Times Correction du Jour
The dreaded Editor's Note returns:
So more freelance concerns return to The Times, a year after the Rick Bragg controversy. In this case, though, it's not clear why the paper would make special note that the writer was freelancing - since it apparently made no mention of that fact in the original articles themselves. By Ed Moltzen · 19 May 2004
Comments
Suddenly, the NYT is not responsible for certain articles because they are not written by full-time employees. Maybe all their bylines should disclose who is freelance and who is not. This is outsourcing at its worst. At least Dell and Microsoft will call their call center in India "employees." Better yet, perhaps the NYT should also italicize all parts of their stories (written by freelancers or fulltimers), where they are lifting wire service copy instead of independent reporting. You may also see more behind the curtain, too! Posted by: Al Depantsiu at May 19, 2004 10:36 AMPost a comment
|
  |